Friday, May 29, 2009
Obama's Approval Poll
An internet site took a poll of President Obama's approval ratings. As a Christian, we are mandated to pray for our president (and I do), however, that must not be confused with a critical eye to important government policies which grate against our consciences.
Having lived over 20 years in the Middle East, foreign policy is A#1 to me.
Obama's snubbing of Israel's Army Chief of Staff, Gabi Ashkenazi, to the point that he packed it up and left the USA early, then the arm twisting of Bibi Netanyahu over Iran's nuclear program, topped off by pressure (residual from the last administration) from our Secretary of State to get used to the idea of a 'contiguous Palestinian State' say to me: Three strikes and you're out!
We need to pay careful attention to the upcoming June 4 address to the Muslim world from Cairo University. To be sure, 1.4 billion Muslims will be paying close attention. The choice of Cairo in and of itself is questionable since Hosseini Mubarak is serving his 5th six-year term in office. His administration has strong-armed, arrested, beaten and all but exiled his political opponents.
The Brookings Institute posted an astute analysis of the event that is well worth reading. http://is.gd/JtF8
One of their points well made is that of poor governance in many Muslim-majority countries. In an era of globalization, many of these governments have been unable to deliver economic growth or provide basic services to their citizens. A recent Brookings Index of Weak States categorized 40 of the world’s 48 Muslim-majority states as either “failed states” (2), “critically weak states” (8), “weak states” (11), or “states to watch” (19). The World Bank, in its ratings of governance performance (where countries are given a governance score ranging from -2.5 to +2.5), gave 38 of the 48 negative scores. This is the cause of much of the anger and frustration that extremists groups like Al Qaeda and the Taliban have capitalized upon.
This Islamic blame-game is a no-win dead end. Historically, economic distress has been the earthquake that has made the wall of the city shake. Major change has ridden on the wake of economic disaster before. What will Obama be able to say that can turn the tide of militant Islam and make them our friends without castigating Israel over the Palestinian issue? Little I doubt.
Thursday, May 28, 2009
Our Mandate
Since Carol and my salvation during the Jesus People Revival of the 1970s, the mandate to connect the modern Church with Israel has been top priority for us. The task is not only living the life of our Messiah amongst the people of God when we lived in the nation of Israel, but exposing the Church to her unique place in the commonwealth of God’s Israel. That job has taken us around the world, from South Africa to Japan, Wales to Mexico City, Brazil to Europe, Russia to the Holocaust camps of Poland and Germany, and so many more places where God has shown Himself still Sovereign Lord of the “Beautiful Land”—a euphemism for Israel.
When Israel gained sovereignty over her stolen capital city of Jerusalem in the 1967 Six Day War, the ripples of that heavenly victory touched every shore of every nation in the world: God reached out and herded masses into the Kingdom of Heaven in such great joy that the movement has taken its place in world history as one of the greatest outpourings of HIS Spirit of all time. Surely it is not hard to connect the dots.
Our ministry is on-going, the mandate still in effect, and the doors still open for us to portray Israel in the glorious light that we know her from over 20 years of on-site experience. The level of interest is not waning, but growing exponentially. What was a trickle of interest after the ‘67 War has become like Niagara Falls. To the furthest reaches of the globe, believing followers of a Jewish Messiah have heard His voice and responded.
To realize that even hermetically sealed empires like China have not only heard His call to action, but have made plans to become involved, even to the detriment of their own security and comfort, is humbling. Should we do less?
We live in unprecedented times. The beautiful message of Israel and our grafted place in the olive tree and Commonwealth has a dark and sinister counterpoint. That being the Evil One’s determination to destroy and discredit her. Turning nations against Israel is his top priority and we must stand against it at all costs. We, believers, constitute a nation within many nations, unified with purposes deeply embedded in God’s end-time plan - and may I say, with great reward.
However, the Genesis 12:3 blessing for those who bless Israel is no longer enough. Building on that foundation, we now support for the safety and security of our own existence against the spreading virus of militant Islamofacism. Israel suffered being the guinea pig, and now the world shares the malice of God’s enemies, just as in times of old: Esther, Nehemiah, Daniel, Jonah and more. I say, “We owe!”
Shavuot Pentecost
Thursday, May 21, 2009
Barak in Cairo: Noble Peace Prize or Anti-Christ?
Ron's Note: Obama is headed to Cairo in June '09 to detail a hard-sell peace program which is merely a take off on other peace plans that have failed. This one is spiced with Obama's new rude muscle. Do it or else is the message. No more fooling around, Obama wants a Noble Peace Prize and he means it! I have interjected comments in italics.
Abraham Rabinovich, Jerusalem | May 22, 2009
Article from: The Australian
US President Barack Obama is expected to outline a far-reaching proposal for a Palestinian-Israeli peace agreement in Cairo next month that will flesh out the Saudi-initiated Arab Peace Plan proposed in 2002 in a way that makes it more palatable to Jerusalem but also requires the Jewish state to make major concessions.
Under the Obama proposal, Palestinian refugees would not be permitted to return to Israel, but they would be permitted to return to the Palestinian state that would arise on the West Bank and Gaza Strip. Those who continue to reside in Arab countries where they have been largely confined to refugee camps for 60 years would be given citizenship of those countries, ending their refugee status.
What will the 900,000 Jews who were driven from Islamic nations, having to leave their belongings behind between 1948 and 1953, be offered? Any remuneration? I doubt it will even be mentioned. That number is contrasted with the 400,000 claimed by Arafat to have fled Israel at the command of Jordan, Egypt, and Syria so they could obliterate Israel.
On the critical question of Jerusalem, Mr Obama will support the Arab demand that Palestinians be permitted to establish their capital in East Jerusalem, which was captured by Israel in the Six Day War in 1967. However, the walled Old City at the heart of Jerusalem, where the principal holy sites of Christianity, Judaism and Islam are located, would become an international enclave and fly the UN flag.
Can we talk about the U.N.'s terrifying history in the Middle East: gunrunning using diplomatic immunity from Jordan and Lebanon; Arafat using the basement of the UN building in Southern Lebanon in 1982 as a terrorist training center and explosives repository; UN involvement in kidnapping IDF soldiers in both Lebanon and Gaza. What a great choice Obama!
The Palestinian state would be demilitarised, maintaining a significant police force to keep order but not an army that might pose a security threat to Israel.
Tell that to Hamas. However, this is good news because Hamas will tell Obama where to take his peace plan.
The pre-Six Day War borders between Israel and the Palestinian territories would be modified, but only by mutually agreed territorial exchanges, not unilateral annexation.
Condi Rice has been to Israel half a dozen times to bang the pulpit shouting "Contigious Palestinian State." That means the West Bank would be connected to Gaza by a land bridge, dividing Israel into north and south for the first time since Solomon's sons. What could we possibly be thinking?
The proposal was reported by the prestigious Arab-language newspaper Al Quds Al Arabi, which is published in London. The paper said the plan would be unveiled by Mr Obama when he gives his much-touted address to the Muslim world in Cairo next month.
According to the newspaper, Mr Obama's plan was drawn up in consultation with Jordan's King Abdullah, who was the first Arab leader to be invited by the President to Washington. The two had first met in Amman last year during Mr Obama's tour of the Middle East as part of his presidential campaign.
After returning from Washington three weeks ago, the king spoke to other Arab leaders in the region, including Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, in a rapid shuttle.
Abbas, just this week told Palestinian Youth that he rejects the idea of recognizing Israel. He will never recognize Israel!
He then gave an interview to The Times of London in which he said Israel was in a position to win recognition from all 57 Muslim countries if it came to terms with the Palestinians.
He said that a peace deal to be brokered by the Americans would be the most comprehensive since the Madrid peace conference in 1991. To sweeten the deal, Israel would be offered immediate benefits such as entry visas to all Arab countries and the right of El Al, Israel's national carrier, to overfly Arab territory.
Oh my, Israelis have just been frothing to enter enemy territory, be spat upon, decapitated, tarred and feathered, and subjected to horrors not unlike Jewish treatment in the dark ages of Europe. Such a great gift.
Acceptance of Israel by all Arab states would, the thinking goes, give Israel the confidence to make concessions to the Palestinians, something more difficult to do when it faces a sea of hostile faces around it.
If Obama can pull this off, let's go ahead and give him his Noble Peace Prize. This tops all other overtures that could gain him his historical limelight.
Should Israel choose, however, to procrastinate instead of accepting a two-state solution, it would be likely to find itself at war within 12 to 18 months, the king said.
There you have it. The noose. If you should choose not to accept this deal, we have cooked up for you a little war. And, since I've (Abdullah of Jordan) warned Obama about this, how could he protest when we do it?
Israeli officials said yesterday that the details of the Obama plan outlined in Al Quds Al Arabi had not been given to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu when he met Mr Obama on Monday.
Hey, I thought we were dedicated to the safety of Israel? I guess not.
But they did not deny the report's plausibility. It is a measure of the new relationship between Washington and Jerusalem since Mr Obama assumed office that such a far-reaching plan would be run by an Arab leader before it was shared with an Israeli leader.
No less noteworthy is Mr Obama's decision to visit Cairo on his first presidential trip to the Middle East, without visiting adjacent Israel.
Mr Obama has put more distance between himself and Israel than previous US leaders. But his moves are perceived in Israel as understandable - many would even say praiseworthy - attempts to restore US credibility in the Arab world.
Let the praises begin. He has already been deified by numerous photographers and artists.
A US administration acceptable to the Arab world has a far greater chance of using its good offices to bring about peace in the region.
Mr Obama's speech in Cairo on June 4 will be a major address to the entire Muslim world, and will not focus exclusively on the Israeli-Palestinian issue. It will aim to rebuild US relations with the Muslim world that were knocked askew following the attacks on September 11, 2001.
Mr. Obama, we can't wait. You've jumped in over your head and may have added the straw that broke the camel's back.
Barak in Cairo: Noble Peace Prize or Anti-Christ?
Ron's Note: Obama is headed to Cairo in June '09 to detail a hard-sell peace program which is merely a take off on other peace plans that have failed. This one is spiced with Obama's new rude muscle. Do it or else is the message. No more fooling around, Obama wants a Noble Peace Prize and he means it! I have interjected comments in italics.
Abraham Rabinovich, Jerusalem | May 22, 2009
Article from: The Australian
US President Barack Obama is expected to outline a far-reaching proposal for a Palestinian-Israeli peace agreement in Cairo next month that will flesh out the Saudi-initiated Arab Peace Plan proposed in 2002 in a way that makes it more palatable to Jerusalem but also requires the Jewish state to make major concessions.
Under the Obama proposal, Palestinian refugees would not be permitted to return to Israel, but they would be permitted to return to the Palestinian state that would arise on the West Bank and Gaza Strip. Those who continue to reside in Arab countries where they have been largely confined to refugee camps for 60 years would be given citizenship of those countries, ending their refugee status.
What will the 900,000 Jews who were driven from Islamic nations, having to leave their belongings behind between 1948 and 1953, be offered? Any remuneration? I doubt it will even be mentioned. That number is contrasted with the 400,000 claimed by Arafat to have fled Israel at the command of Jordan, Egypt, and Syria so they could obliterate Israel.
On the critical question of Jerusalem, Mr Obama will support the Arab demand that Palestinians be permitted to establish their capital in East Jerusalem, which was captured by Israel in the Six Day War in 1967. However, the walled Old City at the heart of Jerusalem, where the principal holy sites of Christianity, Judaism and Islam are located, would become an international enclave and fly the UN flag.
Can we talk about the U.N.'s terrifying history in the Middle East: gunrunning using diplomatic immunity from Jordan and Lebanon; Arafat using the basement of the UN building in Southern Lebanon in 1982 as a terrorist training center and explosives repository; UN involvement in kidnapping IDF soldiers in both Lebanon and Gaza. What a great choice Obama!
The Palestinian state would be demilitarised, maintaining a significant police force to keep order but not an army that might pose a security threat to Israel.
Tell that to Hamas. However, this is good news because Hamas will tell Obama where to take his peace plan.
The pre-Six Day War borders between Israel and the Palestinian territories would be modified, but only by mutually agreed territorial exchanges, not unilateral annexation.
Condi Rice has been to Israel half a dozen times to bang the pulpit shouting "Contigious Palestinian State." That means the West Bank would be connected to Gaza by a land bridge, dividing Israel into north and south for the first time since Solomon's sons. What could we possibly be thinking?
The proposal was reported by the prestigious Arab-language newspaper Al Quds Al Arabi, which is published in London. The paper said the plan would be unveiled by Mr Obama when he gives his much-touted address to the Muslim world in Cairo next month.
According to the newspaper, Mr Obama's plan was drawn up in consultation with Jordan's King Abdullah, who was the first Arab leader to be invited by the President to Washington. The two had first met in Amman last year during Mr Obama's tour of the Middle East as part of his presidential campaign.
After returning from Washington three weeks ago, the king spoke to other Arab leaders in the region, including Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, in a rapid shuttle.
Abbas, just this week told Palestinian Youth that he rejects the idea of recognizing Israel. He will never recognize Israel!
He then gave an interview to The Times of London in which he said Israel was in a position to win recognition from all 57 Muslim countries if it came to terms with the Palestinians.
He said that a peace deal to be brokered by the Americans would be the most comprehensive since the Madrid peace conference in 1991. To sweeten the deal, Israel would be offered immediate benefits such as entry visas to all Arab countries and the right of El Al, Israel's national carrier, to overfly Arab territory.
Oh my, Israelis have just been frothing to enter enemy territory, be spat upon, decapitated, tarred and feathered, and subjected to horrors not unlike Jewish treatment in the dark ages of Europe. Such a great gift.
Acceptance of Israel by all Arab states would, the thinking goes, give Israel the confidence to make concessions to the Palestinians, something more difficult to do when it faces a sea of hostile faces around it.
If Obama can pull this off, let's go ahead and give him his Noble Peace Prize. This tops all other overtures that could gain him his historical limelight.
Should Israel choose, however, to procrastinate instead of accepting a two-state solution, it would be likely to find itself at war within 12 to 18 months, the king said.
There you have it. The noose. If you should choose not to accept this deal, we have cooked up for you a little war. And, since I've (Abdullah of Jordan) warned Obama about this, how could he protest when we do it?
Israeli officials said yesterday that the details of the Obama plan outlined in Al Quds Al Arabi had not been given to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu when he met Mr Obama on Monday.
Hey, I thought we were dedicated to the safety of Israel? I guess not.
But they did not deny the report's plausibility. It is a measure of the new relationship between Washington and Jerusalem since Mr Obama assumed office that such a far-reaching plan would be run by an Arab leader before it was shared with an Israeli leader.
No less noteworthy is Mr Obama's decision to visit Cairo on his first presidential trip to the Middle East, without visiting adjacent Israel.
Mr Obama has put more distance between himself and Israel than previous US leaders. But his moves are perceived in Israel as understandable - many would even say praiseworthy - attempts to restore US credibility in the Arab world.
Let the praises begin. He has already been deified by numerous photographers and artists.
A US administration acceptable to the Arab world has a far greater chance of using its good offices to bring about peace in the region.
Mr Obama's speech in Cairo on June 4 will be a major address to the entire Muslim world, and will not focus exclusively on the Israeli-Palestinian issue. It will aim to rebuild US relations with the Muslim world that were knocked askew following the attacks on September 11, 2001.
Mr. Obama, we can't wait. You've jumped in over your head and may have added the straw that broke the camel's back.
Monday, May 18, 2009
There Will Never Be A Palestinian State
Obama's quote from today's meeting with Benjamin Netanyahu is the death knoll for the Palestinian State.
"The Palestinians are going to have to do a better job of providing the security Israel needs to accept a two-state solution," Obama said. "The other Arab states have to be more supportive and be bolder in seeking potential normalization with Israel," adding that "I will deliver that message to" Mubarak and Abbas next week. http://digg.com/u13b7j
Thinking that the leopard is suddenly going to change his spots, and that other Arab States are going to follow suit is monumental naiveté. This lack of judgment, wisdom, and experience, particularly in foreign policy, must simply mock the office of United States President in the eyes of Israel's Prime Minister.
In an embarrassingly condescending statement Obama expressed confidence in Netanyahu's "political skills as well as his historic vision." The experience of Netanyahu casts a giant shadow over Obama's 'Johnny-come-lately' spot in the world political limelight.
This thinking will have the Arab states laughing through their teeth at America's lack of political savvy in foreign policy matters. Years of diplomacy have been sacrificed to "Change We Can Believe In." The Arabs are happy at the developments, and like the Israeli statesman Abba Eban said, "The Palestinians never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity." Now, knowing that the USA has backed up to square-one, they will forge ahead full speed with their self-defeating agenda.
Good show Obama. You have just chiseled in stone (a tombstone) the epitaph of the Palestinian State.
Saturday, May 9, 2009
Israel has determined to exist!

Editor's Note:
This article is not for everyone. The graphic material here is difficult to process. The information is important for those trying to understand Israel's strong stand against her enemies. I am warning, but hoping that the right people will read, process, and put their feelings into action on behalf of a beleaguered nation with few friends in the world. I have pushed this article to the back burner for 9 years. However, my January journey to study at the International Shool for Holocaust Studies at Yad Vashem in Jerusalem changed my mind. Ignoring horror assures its return. Edmund Burke, a British Statesman said, "All that is necessary for evil to triumph, is for good men to do nothing." (cont'd).
After posting Sarit Hadad's haunting song, Sh'ma Israel Elohai, on my Facebook site, replies told me people were sensing the spirit behind the song. Some cried when listening, most were very moved. I posted a note telling that the song was written after two Israeli soldiers were brutally 'lynched' in the West Bank city of Ramallah in 2000. The dictionary explanation for lynch is lost in the Middle East. There, the term is used for what will be described below.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HJ0KAtGsoLU
It was disturbing to me that news media from the West only briefly covered the incident. The inhumane brutality of the killings should have incited a worldwide outcry. Certainly the United Nations should have gotten involved. They did not, and the real story faded from the news . . . but not from the hearts and minds of Israelis and Jewish people who knew what really happened.
The horrors of the Holocaust came boiling back to the surface, only this time in the Jewish homeland, where security and safety should reign. The dark presence of evil had manifested itself again. It was the kind of evil seen by soldiers who liberated the death factories of Hitlers SS. It was unexplainable hatred from deep inside the realm of evil. In 1945, liberators stood in horror, paralyzed by the sights around them. Some of them, though war hardened, vomiting involuntarily—the body's attempt to expel that which cannot be processed—the rude reality that projecting niceness upon others because you cannot imagine such wickedness does not work.
Media that as a rule is pro-Palestinian responded, but much like the reality-denying German press as Hitler's death machine really got rolling. Italy responded as such:
A representative of Italian Television apologized to the Palestinian Authority for screening the video of the lynching of the two Israeli soldiers - his press card was suspended by Israel for issuing the following apology. Riccardo Christiano, Italian TV's representative in Israel wrote to the PA:
"To my dear friends in Palestine, we bless you, and feel that we must clarify that the photos of the events in Ramallah were taken by a private Italian station, and not by official Italian TV. We emphasize to you that we respect the proper journalistic work guidelines with the Palestinian Authority. Be sure that we would never do something like that."
The two Israeli soldiers entered Ramallah by mistake, and were detained by the Palestinian police. After they were brought to the police station in central Ramallah, a crowd of between 1,000 and 2,000 Arabs broke into the building, overcame the police, and murderously beat and killed the Israelis. Some of the Palestinian police took part in the lynch.
The body of one of the Israelis was dragged around the city chained to a car. Television pictures show Arabs in the window of the station, alternately beating and stabbing someone inside and gleefully making a V sign out the window.
The soldiers were viciously beaten all over their bodies. Military officials who handled the bodies told news media that they were "deliberately tortured and abused... The bodies were mutilated and torn to pieces. There was great difficulty in recognizing them..."
The two soldiers heads were split open and the mob tore their brains out. Literally hundreds of hate drunken members of the Islamic mob that day took turns beating the soldier's bodies beyond recognition.
Hayman Zaben and Aziz Salha (the man displaying his bloody hands out the window), are two of the ringleaders who were arrested for the lynching. However, the shocking story is that of terrorist Nasser Abu Hamiyad. He had been released from an Israeli prison as a good-will gesture in the context of the Oslo Accords and then took part in the Ramallah lynch. The West pressures Israel into handing over such prisoners on a regular basis, returning animals loose back into society to repeat their crimes.
Two years later Hamiyad also organized an attack on Jerusalem’s northern most neighborhood of Neve Yaakov, murdering a female police officer and wounding 10. On March 5, 2002, he orchestrated an attack on the Seafood Market in Tel Aviv, murdering Israelis Eliyahu Dahan and Yossi Havi, and wounding 31. This Western pressure is the "New anti-Semitism." The dictate to restrain yourself, when your neighbors are commiting atrocities against your population.
The growing numbers of Israel positive activists will make a difference in their respective nations. The majority of staunch supporters of Israel happen to be evangelical Christians who know the pain they have suffered and have said, "Enough!" We will not stand by quietly and let Israel stand alone.
(cont'd) I will post the photos (extremely graphic) for which the warning at the top of this post applies. You may view the photos on my web site with a password.
The web site is: shalom-shalom-jerusalem.org
Tuesday, May 5, 2009
Iran's Ahmadinejad's New Tirade Against Israel
DAMASCUS (Agencies)
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad slammed Zionism as "occupation" and "aggression" Tuesday as he delivered his latest diatribe against the Jewish state on a visit to key Middle East ally Syria.
"The Zionist occupiers are destructive microbes, because Zionism itself is occupation, aggression, the use of assassination and annihilation," he told a joint news conference with President Bashar al-Assad in the Syrian capital.
"Zionism was created to threaten us. To support the Palestinian resistance is a humanitarian and popular obligation," Ahmadinejad said in remarks in Farsi that were translated into Arabic.
Zionism was created to threaten us. To support the Palestinian resistance is a humanitarian and popular obligation
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
The Iranian president's comments came barely two weeks after he sparked a European walkout from a U.N. anti-racism conference in Geneva by equating Zionism with racism.
Ahmadinejad asked why it was the Islamist Hamas movement which controls Gaza that is blacklisted by the European Union and the United States, and not Israel after its devastating offensive against the territory at the turn of the year.
"They've attacked Gaza, killing people in their own land and massacring women and children... and yet it's the Palestinians they accuse of terrorism," he complained.
Ahmadinejad, whose visit to Damascus came as Defense Secretary Robert Gates toured U.S. allies in the region to reassure them about overtures to the Tehran regime by President Barack Obama, hit out at the continuing U.S. military presence on Iran's borders.
"They weren't invited in. They're unwelcome visitors who should leave Afghanistan and the borders of Pakistan," the Iranian president said.
"We don't want honey from bees that sting us. Efforts must be made to rid the region of the presence of foreigners... and to reform the unjust global political and economic system."
Circumstances are changing rapidly in our favor. We are on the road to victory
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad - Standing together
Ahmadinejad said Iran and Syria were standing together to "resist foreign intervention and the major powers trying to impose their hegemony over the region."
The United States "has put pressure on Syria and Iran, but it needs us and wants to develop relations," he said.
"Circumstances are changing rapidly in our favor. We are on the road to victory."
Syria's President Assad in turn defended his country’s long-standing alliance with Iran on Tuesday and said a "strategic" relationship between the two countries contributed to Middle East stability.
Syria has re-enforced its alliance with Iran in recent years after they came under pressure from the United States for suspected nuclear programs and providing backing for armed groups in the Middle East.
"We have strategic ties ... which don't constitute an axis as some suggest, but serve the stability and strength of this region," Assad said.
"Our duty is to strengthen these kinds of ties."
The two countries, which are under different levels of U.S. sanctions, support the Lebanese movement Hezbollah and the Palestinian movement Hamas, whose exiled leaders live in Syria.
Hezbollah, the lynchpin of the relationship between Tehran and Damascus, is also the main opposition party contesting Lebanon's parliamentary elections next month. The two countries want to see the Shi'ite group fare well in the poll.
The sustainability of their alliance, however, is under some doubt as Syria pushes for a resumption of peace negotiations with Israel and the United States talks to Damascus after boycotting Syria for several years.
Ahmadinejad was also due to meet exiled Hamas leader Khaled Meshaal during his Damascus visit.
Sunday, May 3, 2009
How Outsiders View Americans - Canada Free Press on Obama
The President Who Hates His Country
In the last century, the impassioned words and actions of patriots like Winston Churchill – along with America’s heroic help and sacrifice – saved Europe. The eloquence and actions of “I’ve been to the mountaintop” Martin Luther King Jr. brought America to an unprecedented level of social justice.
The peerless oratory and tireless diplomacy of the man who would become Israel’s Foreign Minister, Abba Eban convinced the entire world that after the wanton murder of six-million Jews in the Holocaust its straggling survivors deserved their own state of Israel. The inspiring words and decisive actions of President Ronald Reagan ended the Cold War, tore down the Berlin Wall, and restored economic prosperity to America. The efforts of these towering figures resulted in a more highly-evolved world.
We have also seen the opposite in totalitarian leaders like Hitler, Mussolini, Fidel Castro, Pol Pot, Mao, and Saddam Hussein, among others, who exploited their masses, destroyed their economies, brought havoc, turbulence, grief and massive death within and outside of their countries, and made the world a more dangerous and threatening place.
The one thing all of these virtuous and evil men had in common was love for their respective countries, in fact a burning passion that superseded all else. The virtuous believed in freedom and democracy. The evil believed in subjugation of their peoples and lifetime tenures for themselves in order to actualize their goals of conquering their eternal enemies – Americans and Jews.
Today, we have a new crop of inveterate America- and Jew-haters, among them the Marxist leader of Venezuela Hugo Chavez, Nicaragua’s president Daniel Ortega, Iran’s “death-to-America-and-Israel” study-in-abnormal-psychology Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, and the ever-sabotage-America and anti-Semitic “leaders” of the 22-Arab states that surround Israel.
I have either read about or observed firsthand all of these people. Yet in my decades of commenting on the political scene, I cannot recall a single leader of any country or regime who has ever spoken negatively of his country or tolerated others speaking ill of the land or the people he represented
Until now
Bizarre and, yes, repugnant as it is to our essentially centrist country, America now has a president who has broken that time-honored tradition. Barack Obama, on the campaign trail and as the leader of the free world is the first U.S. president to proclaim to anyone within earshot that he, like his wife, is not proud of his country, and is all-too-willing to offer serial apologies – for America! – to Americans and foreigners alike.
As Ed Lasky writes: “We know that during the campaign [Obama] warned that criticism of his wife was `off-limits’. But criticism of America – well, that is fine.”
We also know that during his run for the presidency, Obama expressed sneering condescension towards all those bible-clasping, gun-owning yahoos who “cling” to those silly things, and that in Europe he consistently gave voice to America’s supposed “sins.” But all that pales in comparison to the clear contempt – looks more like hatred to me – that Obama feels for the United States of America and for its most revered founding document, the U.S. Constitution.
In just the first 100-days of his tenure, Obama’s words and actions have demonstrated that he is no friend of the country he leads. This is only a smattering of what happened on his recent three-continent trip abroad and to Mexico:
- In France, Obama told his audience that America “has shown arrogance and been dismissive, even derisive” toward Europe.
- In Prague, Obama – in true utopian-kindergarten fashion – pledged “with conviction” that America will “seek the peace and security of a world without nuclear weapons.” In other words, destroy big bad America’s ability to defend itself!
- In London, Obama made clear that the world’s financial wealth was no longer made by those inferior leaders Roosevelt and Churchill, effectively ceding America’s leading role in creating and sharing wealth to nations that have never measured up to our country’s bountiful generosity or spirit of free-market entrepreneurship.
- In Venezuela, Obama sat passively while the Marxist Chavez handed him an American-bashing book and delivered another revile-America speech, while never once rising to defend our country.
- In Nicaragua, Obama again sat passively while the Marxist Ortega blamed the United States for a century of what he called terroristic U.S. aggression in Central America, again emitting not a whisper of defense on our country’s behalf.
- In Turkey, Obama said – incredibly and inaccurately – that America was not a Christian nation.
- And in his recent trip to Mexico, Obama said that the escalating border violence was essentially America’s fault.
Scan you memory. Can you think of any other leader in world history who so consistently badmouths his own country, or fails to defend it? I can’t.
Wall St. Journal writer Dorothy Rabinowitz notes that Obama “had gone to Europe not as the voice of his nation, but as a missionary with a message of atonement for its errors. No sitting American president had ever delivered indictments of this kind while abroad, or for that matter at home. When [our allies] see Obama’s moral equivalence, they realize they are on their own and must cut their own deals to survive – understanding that multicultural trendiness is now a cynical cover for moral laxity and ‘can’t we all get along?’
Historian Victor Davis Hanson also noticed something odd about Obama’s apology tour. “Despite this fresh climate of atonement, there was a complete absence of a single apology from any other foreign leader…not a word came from Britain about colonialism…nothing from Germany on the Holocaust…not a peep from France about Algeria or Vietnam. Turkey was mum on the Armenian killings…Russia said nothing about the 30 million murdered by Stalin…Nothing came from China about the 70 million who perished under Mao…Mr. Medvedev said nothing about Putin’s brutish rule…We saw no concrete evidence of any help — or hope and change — from any foreign leader. Zilch.”
In addition, Hanson continues, “We hear nothing about our Gettysburg, or our entry into World War I. Iwo Jima and the Bulge are never alluded to. Drawing the line in Korea and forcing the end of the Soviet monstrosity are taboo subjects. That we pledged the life of New York for Berlin in the Cold War is unknown. Liberating Afghanistan and Iraq from the diabolical Taliban and Saddam Hussein is left unsaid. The Civil Rights movement, the Great Society, affirmative action, and present billion-dollar foreign-aid programs apparently never existed. Millions of Africans have been saved by George Bush’s efforts at extending life-saving medicines to AIDS patients — but again, this is never referenced.”
Blogger James Lewis says that Obama’s “obsessive need to put down his own country shows a stunningly ignorant man who has evidently never spoken to a concentration camp survivor, a Cuban refugee, a boat person from Vietnam, a Soviet dissident, or a survivor of Mao’s purges.”
And Media Research Center’s Brent Bozell adds, “Obama `gets’ the America-haters.”
Abandoning allies, Embracing enemies
“If you are a longtime enemy of the United States, count on a grand reception from the Obama administration. All is forgiven and, worse, forgotten,” write Dick Morris and Eileen McGann. “But if you have a track record as an ally or friend, you won’t get the right time of day.”
Of course apologists for Obama & Co. point to “progress” in our foreign policy, ignoring, as Caroline Glick points out, that “America’s betrayal of its democratic allies makes each of them more vulnerable to aggression at the hands of their enemies – enemies the Obama administration is now actively attempting to appease.” Glick lays out the cold hard facts:
- Obama abrogated America’s strategic commitment to the defense of our ally Japan when his administration reacted to North Korea’s ballistic missile test by saying the U.S. would only shoot the missile down if it targeted U.S. territory.
- Obama slapped our ally India when he refused to make ending Pakistan’s support for jihadist terror groups attacking India a central component of its strategy for contending with Pakistan and Afghanistan.
- Obama failed to assure our ally Iraq that democracy and freedom will be secured before U.S. forces are withdrawn next year.
- Obama de facto abandoned our allies in Eastern Europe when he announced his intention to forge a new alliance with Russia. “The Czech, Polish, Georgian and Ukrainian governments,” Glick says, “were quick to recognize that Obama’s strong desire to curry favor with the Kremlin and weaken his own country will imperil their ability to withstand Russian aggression.”
- Obama “is sacrificing the U.S.’s alliance with our ally Israel “in a bid to appease the Arabs and Iran by supporting the immediate establishment of a Palestinian state,” which, Glick warns, “requires Israel to commit national suicide in exchange for `peace.’” Obama also made clear “that from the administration’s perspective, an Israeli strike that prevents Iran from becoming a nuclear power is less acceptable than a nuclear-armed Iran.” In addition, Obama sent Hamas $900 million of foreign aid, “channeled through the UNRWA, a United Nations front filled with Hamas operatives”
- Obama slapped our ally England when he returned the bust of Winston Churchill to Prime Minister Gordon Brown.
- Obama slapped our ally Colombia and its president Alvaro Uribe when he refused to submit the free trade deal with Bogota to the Senate.
“What a great time to be our enemy!” Glick exclaims. “What a terrible time to be our friend!”
And speaking about appeasing Iran, the Obama administration recently asked a federal judge to throw out a $6.6-billion class-action lawsuit against Iran filed by 52 American diplomats and military officials held hostage for more than a year at the U.S. Embassy in Tehran 30 years ago. Nothing like selling out Americans to make brownie points with a bloodthirsty dictator!
Barry Rubin explains: “Friends, especially in Europe, are pleased, applaud, but then add that they don’t have to give this guy anything because he is all apologies and no toughness. They like the fact that he is all carrots and no sticks. If, however, they are states more at risk…they worry that they cannot rely on the United States to help and defend them. Enemies or potential rivals…say that this guy is weak and defeated. He apologizes, offers unconditional engagements, and promises concessions…they’ll eat the carrots and, if possible, their neighbors as well.”
NY Post writer Ralph Peters, a former military intelligence officer, sums up the hate-America core tenets of the “Obama Doctrine” as follows:
(1) We’re to blame,
(2) Problems can be negotiated away,
(3) Problems that can’t be talked out can be bought off,
(4) Islamist terrorism doesn’t exist,
(5) It’s all our fault,
(6) Israel’s the obstacle to Middle East peace,
(7) Our nukes threaten world peace and we need to get rid of them,
(8) Our military is dangerous,
(9) Our intelligence services are even more dangerous than our military,
(10) It’s only torture if we do it, and
(11) Blame President George W. Bush.
Obama is clearly not satisfied with threatening the safety of our tried-and-true allies abroad. He is also determined to undermine the bedrock foundation of America’s security – our military and intelligence agencies. By disclosing interrogation memos – and planning to release photographs associated with military probes into prisoner abuse – he has betrayed every heroic person who risks his or her life for our country, and unforgivably given aid-and-comfort to enemies who seethe with virulent anti-Americanism and lust for our demise. And in the Department of Homeland Security’s infamous memo, he has called members of our military, among others, potential domestic terrorists!
“After September 1th, the general outcry was, ‘Why don’t we have better overseas capabilities?’” said Porter Goss, director of the CIA from September 2004 to May 2006. “I fear that in the years to come, this refrain will be heard again. It is certainly not trust that is fostered when intelligence officers are told one day ‘I have your back,’ only to learn a day later that a knife is being held to it.”
How horrifying to contemplate that it is the President of the United States himself who is wielding that back-stabbing knife!
Questioning Obama’s patriotism
Before the November election, legal scholar Henry Mark Holzer wrote – and scrupulously documented – a stunning indictment of Obama in which he stated that Obama’s repeatedly professed claim to be a patriot is “a fraud on the American people – and an insult to the countless true patriots who, for over two hundred years, have loved and loyally and zealously supported the United States of America.”
“Patriots,” Holzer concluded, “don’t associate with and derive sustenance from terrorists, America-haters and anti-Semites; they don’t countenance fixed elections; they don’t keep secrets from voters; they don’t intimidate their enemies; they don’t denigrate and degrade our military; they don’t gratuitously interfere with their government’s efforts to protect our country; and they don’t disdain the symbol of this great nation, which for over two centuries men and women have fought and died: the American flag. Whatever Barack Obama is, we can be certain that he is no patriot!”
The events that have followed Obama’s election, Holzer says, “have compounded the proof of the president’s lack of patriotism,” which he has recently spelled out in a follow-up article. A few of the many examples he provides of what “a patriotic American president does not do include:
- Bankrupt this country and court massive inflation in order to implement his vision of a fascist/socialist nation.
- Sit on his hands with a straight face while a South American thug insults his country.
- Appoint America-haters to his cabinet.
- Cozy up to a soon-to-be-nuclear-armed Iranian madman.
- Impotently watch the probably-already-nuclear-armed North Korean Stalinists lob a ballistic missile across the Pacific.
- Fail to stanch the flow of illegal aliens across the Mexican-United States border.
- Cut the defense budget.
- Strangle innovation during a serious recession by raising taxes.
- Close Guantanamo Bay without a clue of how to handle the enemy combatants incarcerated there.
- Publicly announce what measures military and CIA interrogators can use to extract information from terrorists.
- Apologize to the world for what has made America great and grovel to persons, nations. and institutions unfit to shine our shoes!
- Cede American sovereignty to the American-hating United Nations.
- Defy the Second Amendment and a Supreme Court decision by making an end run that substantially reduces the supply of certain ammunition.
- Repudiate the policy and practice of missile shield installation.”
Some dare call it treason
It is one thing to question a president’s patriotism, but even more serious to accuse him of treason. In an open letter to Obama on Treason, Walter Francis Fitzpatrick, III (U.S. Naval Academy, Class of 1975) minces no words in accusing the president of sending Army forces to Samson, Alabama, and Boston in violation of the Constitution. Here are excerpts of his letter:
“I have observed and extensively recorded invidious attacks by military-political aristocrats against the Constitution for twenty years. Now you have broken in and entered the White House by force of contrivance, concealment, conceit, and deceit. Posing as an imposter president and commander in chief, you have stripped civilian command and control over the military establishment…
“We come now to the reckoning. I accuse you and your military-political criminal assistants of TREASON. I name you and your military criminal associates as traitors. Your criminal ascension manifests a clear and present danger. You fundamentally changed our form of government. The Constitution no longer works….“I identify you as a foreign-born domestic enemy. You are not my president. You are not my commander in chief.
Fitzpatrick is not alone. John Smith – a blogger on Townhall.com, titled a recent article “Obama Is a Traitor.” Commenting on the president’s release of the “torture” memos, Smith says:
“Given the actions of Barack Obama in recent days, one has to wonder how many soon-to-be released State secrets have been gathered by radical left-wing traitors and hidden in the dark recesses of Washington, awaiting the Manchurian Candidate’s command to publish them…
“The motivation for Obama’s recent intentional disclosure of Top Secret CIA memoranda…was an act committed solely to increase his own political power through appeasement of the radical left…or was it …guided by the twisted moral imperative uniquely embraced by the Left, which dictates that only those actions that serve to limit individual liberty, punish patriotism, and destroy the traditions and culture of the United States of America are good?…
“Were Obama’s actions motivated by a deeply rooted desire to harm this Nation?…
“Article III of the Constitution defines Treason against the United States as “… levying War against them or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort…”.
“Top Secret information is the highest level of classification that we have on a national level. By definition, such material, if made public, will cause “exceptionally grave damage” to national security…
“The willful disclosure of Top Secret information is an act of Treason against the United States….A sitting President of The United States of America has committed Treason.”
Fitzpatrick and Smith are among a rising tide of voices – in and outside of the military – who have observed with growing horror Obama’s proclivity to destroy our capitalist economic system, subvert the U.S. Constitution, endanger our military and intelligence services, and obsequiously embrace America’s sworn enemies.
Dr. Jack Wheeler, a consummate Washington insider, goes one step further. “The evidence that the President of the United States is a traitor is mounting. The evidence that the President of the United states is a mortal danger to America’s national security is mounting. The evidence that the President of the United States will not defend America from threats and insults from every two-bit fascist dictator in the world …is not only mounting, it is overwhelming.”
Writer Amy L. Geiger-Hammer states: “I do wonder if Obama should be called a traitor or just incompetent…does he ever talk about what a great country America is?”
And UK journalist Gerald Warner echoes that rising tide: “If al-Qaeda, the Taliban and the rest of the Looney Tunes brigade want to kick America to death, they had better move in quickly and grab a piece of the action before Barack Obama finishes the job himself. Never in the history of the United States has a president worked so actively against the interests of his own people - not even Jimmy Carter. Obama’s problem is that he does not know who the enemy is. To him, the enemy does not squat in caves in Waziristan, clutching automatic weapons and reciting the more militant verses from the Koran: instead, it sits around at tea parties in Kentucky quoting from the US Constitution. “
Is America Lost?
Multiple lawsuits to find proof that Obama is Constitutionally ineligible to be president are ongoing and will ultimately determine if he is an American or Kenyan or Indonesian or UK “natural-born” citizen. To this date, he has spent over a million dollars blocking the suits about his still-missing birth certificate, and there is increasing evidence that the birth certificate attested to by FactCheck.org, FightTheSmears.org, and DailyKos.com are forgeries. And of course we still have not seen Obama’s Selective Service record, medical records, multiple visas, college transcripts, et al.
If Obama is proven to be the fraud and interloper many suspect, every one of his edicts, bills, laws, dictates, Supreme Court selections, et al, will be overturned , leaving America to cope with serious problems – under the leadership of the incomprehensible Joe Biden – but nothing approaching this hate-America president’s far-left socialist domestic programs and appease-our-enemies foreign policy.
The huge national turnouts at the Tea Parties of April 15 were only the beginning of a movement that was spurred by ordinary Americans waking up to Obama’s destruction of our economy, his attempts to reshape America into a banana republic, the grave damage he’s inflicted on our military and intelligence services, and his unsavory predilection for embracing our enemies and apologizing non-stop for the most magnificent nation on earth.
In short, they are waking up to the president who hates his country.
Editor Charlotte Baker predicts that “the Tea Parties and other, more aggressive, protests will grow exponentially, and that the Obama juggernaut can and will be stopped.” It’s crucial, she says, “for all Americans to recall the history they learned in school – at least before the Left hijacked what used to be known as `education.’ The Europeans, Japanese and Russians were all taken over by one form or another of totalitarianism because their combined history was one of absolute rulers – kings, czars and `divine’ emperors. They were totally conditioned to tyranny.
“But the monstrous anti-American gang that rigged the voting system on November 4, 2008– as they do routinely in Obama’s Chicago Machine politics – to push Obama into We-the-People’s White House, have shown – even before his inauguration – the kind of overreaching that arrogant tyrants always demonstrate. Hitler, Mao, Tojo and Stalin all got away with overreaching, but they weren’t brutalizing Americans.
“Tolerating totalitarianism is simply not in the genetic code – the DNA – of Americans!” Baker adds. “Freedom and Liberty run in our blood!”
Indeed!